Are you one of the 245,386? There IS another way for those who react adversely to drugs.

Are you one of the 245,386?

In answer to a question put by Lord Pearson of Rannoch on Herbal Medicines in the House of Lords, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health, Earl Howe, reported on records of adverse drug reaction (ADR) obtained from health professionals, patients and indirectly from the pharmaceutical industry via the Yellow Card Scheme.  Earl Howe said that since 200o, in England and Wales, 245,386 ADR reports have been received of which, 10,446 (4 per cent) recorded a fatal outcome.  (Corresponding figures for herbal medicine were quoted as 837 ADR and 8 fatalities.)

Despite the preciseness of the figures, Earl Howe qualified the statistics. Firstly, they may be too optimistic.  He said that “The number of reports received via the Yellow Card scheme does not directly equate to the number of people who suffer adverse reactions in the general population to medicines as this scheme is associated with an unknown level of underreporting.” Alternatively, they might be too pessimistic, “It should be noted that healthcare professionals are asked to report suspected adverse reactions on a voluntary basis and the submission of a report does not mean that the reaction cited was definitely caused by the medicine or herbal.”

Either way, they are LARGE numbers.

(In the United States, the equivalent figures are staggering.  According to JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, in 1996 108,000 Americans died in hospitals alone “from adverse reactions to Federal Drug Agency approved drugs properly administered by licensed medical professionals”.  In the same year, 2.2 million Americans had adverse reactions to FDA-approved drugs.)

The Internet didn’t exist as a public entity which could host a Yellow Card Scheme for the recording of ADR the last time I took a drug, just over 30 years ago.  My experience would have fallen comfortably – well, uncomfortably! – into the ADR category, though. The anti-biotics prescribed for my sinusitis were a miserable failure in causing a cure and a mighty “success” in causing a bodily reaction that stayed with me for months, long after that particularly painful bout of sinusitis had dulled down into a distant memory.

That’s not to say that anyone is totally prone to ADR.  A relative of mine almost died from penicillin given to him as a new-born baby but gratefully credits his recent survival of pneumonia to the ministrations of medicine.

It is, though, to suggest that for the sake of society’s well-being and happiness, some more intelligent thought could profitably be given to the downside of the side effects associated with the near-monopolisation of healthcare by material approaches to medicine.

On an individual basis, I certainly gave some thought to that when the sinusitis recurred and I was faced with the above-noted scenario for my prospects under medication versus just suffering in silence.  Neither appealed! Understandably.

Fortunately, in the interim period I was introduced to Christian Science as a spiritual healthcare approach that has no adverse physical side effects. And when I first applied it to a bout of sinusitis, that in and of itself was such a relief, even while the condition itself still lingered.

When the sinusitis was vanquished by my practice of Christian Science I was overjoyed.  And I mean vanquished.  It wasn’t just that single bout of sinusitis that went away, the condition has never recurred in my three drug-free decades since.  Using Christian Science for my healthcare has, though, had many positive side-effects, especially getting to know God so much better, as infinitely impartial divine Love.

Critics of Christian Science argue that the very choice of using Christian Science is dangerous, because it involves the foregoing of western medicine. That monopolistic thought assumes too much of western medicine, as the ADR statistics illustrate, and it assumes too little of Christian Science.

It is true that “doing nothing” is not acceptable when faced with a physical ailment.  Proper application of Christian Science, though, is far from “doing nothing” but rather it is choosing to do the “something” that really reaches for the mental causes behind disease and suffering, identifies them, and uproots them.  (To see how this worked in the case of my sinusitis healing, please read the third “transitional moment” in .)  In cases where Christian Science is not proving effective, individuals are always free to choose western medicine or other approaches to healthcare and I certainly know those who have done so.

It is crucial that we all respect each other’s healthcare choices and continue to legislate fairly for the variety of preferences that exist.  I certainly respect those who choose western medicine, although I would say to anyone who is among the 245,386…if you want to explore your options, read some of the articles on healing on spirituality.com, or peruse Mary Baker Eddy’s Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, and see if it works for you, as it has worked for me!

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Categories: Legislation

Author:Tony Lobl

I write on spirituality and health for a diversity of online media outlets, from my perspective as a Christian Science practitioner. I have been published by the Independent, the Washington Post, the Guardian, E-Hospice, MindBodyGreen and The Christian Science Monitor and I post regularly on the Huffington Post UK and BuzzFeed. In addition to writing and broadcast appearances I enjoy engaging with journalists, academics, health professionals and government officials about the possibilities for improving health outcomes through a greater emphasis on spirituality in healthcare and social care. I've also greatly valued the many opportunities I have had to travel globally for my church and to meet people around the world. My wife Jenny and I spent 10 years in Boston, USA, before returning to London in 2002, to take on a role as the media and legislative liaison for Christian Science in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. I studied at the University of Surrey earning a BSc Hons Degree in Modern Mathematics before the impact of spirituality on health caught my attention and re-shaped my career.

If you want to keep updated...

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

5 Comments on “Are you one of the 245,386? There IS another way for those who react adversely to drugs.”

  1. Romee Hindle
    February 10, 2011 at 5:16 pm #

    I like to send to-days blog to my brother-in-law in Amsterdam. I am surprised I cannot do this? Or am I looking with my nose?
    Thank you for all the interesting blogs.

  2. February 10, 2011 at 5:33 pm #

    Hi Romee – Yes – although I have never heard this lovely expression before! -you are looking with your nose…! :)

    Just under the blog, there is a place where people can choose to “vote” for the blog…you’ll see yellow stars, because someone has chosen to do that. (Thank you, “someone”!) And just under those stars it says: “If you like it, please spread the word!” Right next to that there is a symbol and the word “Email”. If you click on either of those, you will then see a box where you put the email of the person you want to send it to (your brother-in-law) and also a box to put in a word code they are asking you to fill in (to make sure ou are a person and not a machine). When you have filled in the email address and the code you are ready to send!

    I am afraid there is no room to send a message, so if you want to explain to your brother-in-law why you are sending it, then you will have to send a separate email.

    Thanks for sharing it!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Media Inquiries » Are you one of the 245,386? There IS another way for those who react adversely to drugs. - February 17, 2011

    [...] Click here for the original post by blogger Tony Lobl who is the London-based spokesperson for Christian Science in British, Irish/EU media & legislatures. admin | Posted: February 17, 2011 | 4:40 pm [...]

  2. Are you one of the 245,386? There IS another way for those who react adversely to drugs. | Temp - March 9, 2011

    [...] Click here for the original post by blogger Tony Lobl who is the London-based spokesperson for Christian Science in British, Irish/EU media & legislatures. admin | Posted: February 17, 2011 | 4:40 pm [...]

  3. Are you one of the 245,386? There IS another way for those who react adversely to drugs. | Press Room for ChristianScience.com - August 30, 2011

    [...] Click here for the original post by blogger Tony Lobl who is the London-based spokesperson for Christian Science in British, Irish/EU media & legislatures. [...]

Let me know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,549 other followers

%d bloggers like this: